| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 03:37 PM 1/19/2000 -0800, B. Twieg wrote: >In looking at the table, I'm reminded that none of the Epson paper sizes >seem to match well the proportions of a 35 mm negative(I think about 1.5W to >1 Height. The letter size(8.5X11) cuts off the width. When I had Kodak >commercial prints done, I got 8X12 inches, which allowed me to use all of >the negative. > >What size prints do some of you make from what size paper after allowing for >the Epson margins? I have an Epson 1200. Actually 11x17 is a very good match for 35mm (10.76" x 16.38" on my EX, ratio 1.52:1). Epson's heavy-weight matte paper only comes in A3 (11.7 x 16.5), which isn't quite so good--but if you cut it in half, 8.25 x 11.7 is closer to 35mm proportions than 8.5 x 11. I think you can get Photo Paper in A3 also, although I can't find my list at the moment. Gary Hunt <glh@srv.net> - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |