|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
In a message dated 1/5/00 9:52:48 PM, email@example.com writes: >Maybe this is off-topic, but I hope not. I'm interested in a flatbed >scanner (with transparency adapter) as a poor man's way of >being able to get my 4x5 negatives (B&W) into the computer >so I can print them on my Epson printer. (See, it is relevant.) >The new 1600 dpi Epson looks interesting, but I don't actually >need that much resolution for the biggest prints I make on my >Photo EX--the Epson 1200U Photo would be good enough in >this regard. My question is, are there any other advantages >of the new scanner that would make it worth 3 times as much? We're comparing a low end product to a mid line one here... the Perfection 1200 was the highest rez scanner Epson offered last week, but it is listed as a business scanner, not a graphics arts scanner. Specificly the added dynamic range of the 1600 (3.3 to 3.0) will make a huge difference for chromes, the Zenon instead of cold cathode lamp, and some difficult to define features of the head design and CCD technology will make a quality difference. C. David Tobie Design Cooperative CDTobie@designcoop.com - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users