| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
> One variable on "C" prints to consider is: by whom were they
> processed? I have commercially developed prints and I have
> MY own processed prints. Mine have always equalled, but
> usually surpassed, the commercial stuff. I assume that
> totally fresh chemicals and archival washing helped mine to
> endure.
You're probably right. I used an 8 x 10 which I didn't care about: not a
custom print, but a commercial enlargement. Fuji material, though that
does not necessarily mean much. But even in the higher end, chemicals
change throughout a batch, the batches of emulsion change, etc. All
things being optimal, I would normally expect a properly-done negative
("C") print to survive longer than an Epson inkjet using manufacturer's
inks. But sometimes we are surprised by reality...
John Lasruk
Toronto Canada
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |