|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
At 08:54 AM 12/13/99 -0800, Sam McCandless wrote: The >more expensive, meant to be "archival", inks would not be >uneconomical for me if they resulted in longer lasting prints on such >paper. Because I am interested in text and line-art quality as well >as image quality ... (snip) You might consider trying a 6-color Canon printer with archival inks: they spray a precoat under each drop, which prevents (to some extent) bleeding on plain papers. I don't know how easy/hard they are to refill, though, or how the precoat would affect the longevity of archival inks. Mitch V. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp Users]