|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
I have both printers and the 1160 is only marginally faster if at all - the benefit for me is simply the much smaller grain. The 1160 is slightly less saturated and has to be compensated for - I guess because of the smaller droplet size. Garry On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 17:19:27 EST TMorris862@aol.com writes: > To: Murray & Irina Zaharia > > In a message dated 99-12-08 16:42:02 EST, you wrote: > > << My initial testing with the 1160 and Archiva inks is underway. > All I will > say right now is WOW! On almost all papers so far the 1160 gives > me an > equal or better (sharper) image than my Ex with Epson inks. Deep, > dark > blacks included. I will post more results after the weekend. This > is > definately a great combination!! > > Regards, > Murray Zaharia >> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Great news about the image of the 1160 hey I like the 1160! I just > do not > think it would hold up the the amount of prints I run and the 1520 > is a > proven workhorse. > > I might get the 1160 or the 1200 just for some smaller prints but > for now as > you know I do the big stuff. , and others ( finally) have posted > that for the > big stuff the 1520 is just fine! > > But now that you are printing with the 1160 is it any faster that > your other > Epsons? > > Thanks > > TomCat > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use > accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp Users]