RE: Wilhelm / ratings of archivalness / our customer relations

["Gary" <tapo@mind.net>]

Thanks Urusla, yes I do have a copy of this myself. Of course these combos
are not my what I am questioning about, but it indicates for some reason he
has removed apparently all references to Epson output from the site for the
time being...which is part of what I was saying and thinking maybe "we"
might want to be thinking about when "we" are telling others about the hoped
for archivalness of this or that we are selling or promoting...Ronnie
Rayguns trickle down theory in practice - the marketers say, so you say, so
they believe, and whoops, oh well. I mean we all try, or do we
anymore...just thinking out loud, Gary

>> Gary,
>
> Back in  Feb.1997 Wilhelm put out a report which reads as follows:
>
> Epson Stylus 3000 with Standard Espon Inks:
>
> Fuji Super Photo Grade Inkjet Paper 			4-5 years
> Epson Photo Quality Glossy  White Film			2-3 years
> Epson Photo Quality Glossy Paper				2 years
> Epson hoto Quality Ink Jet Paper (matte)		1-2 years
> Kodak Inkjet Photographic Quality Paper (new)	being tested
> Kodak Photo Weight Premium Glossy Paper		6 months
>
> I guess it's worth keeping old reports as they do not get
> listed repeatedly.
>
> Ursula Freer

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.