|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Daniel Salzedo wrote: > > I understand Jerry's position perfectly. I assume most of his 2000 images > are personal and/or family pictures of no commercial interest to anyone > else. 2000x $2.50=$5000. This is, by my personal standards, quite a large > enough sum to worry about for a purely personal project like this. It's really odd to hear photographers in the digital age talking like they still have to make prints in the darkroom. You've forgotten that while there was a time when an expenditure of paper and chemistry was necessary to do anything more than squint at a negative, those days are over. Nonetheless, the art of selecting one's best work is as pertinent as ever. Just because you have digital tools at hand doesn't mean you can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Jan -- faces 'n places http://www.artfaul.com Agfa gallery http://www.agfaphoto.com/gallery/pf9707/index.html Wisconsin farms http://www.weslow.net/imagery/jfaul - Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users