against the law to void a warranty for using a third party ink?

[j wilhelm <meridian@reninet.com>]

At 01:09 PM 8/21/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>It is against the law to void a warranty for using a third party ink. 

How can Epson be responsible for someone clogging a printer with pigmented
inks that can't pass through a head designed for dye based ink?  Doesn't
this just void free replacement on this incidence but not the warranty in
general?

Just wondering where that gray area is.  

Thanks,

Joseph


-
* Dygraphics is proud to introduce Somerset Photo Enhanced!!       *
* This unique coated paper is now available in limited quantities. *
* Order on-line or by phone 888-786-8832: http//www.dygraphics.com *