| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
And for the technically ponderous among us, the practical difference would be? >Ladies and Gents, there may be more to this. Here is my understanding of how >the Nikon scanners work. They have a monochrome CCD and LED illumination to >generate RGB sequentially. It sounds to me from reading the Polaroid >SprintScan 4000 technical specification that the unit has a Color CCD with a >RGB "shadow" mask. This is similar to comparing a 3CCD camcorder to a 1CCD >camcorder. > >My point is a pixel is a pixel with a Nikon, while a pixel with a shadow >mask CCD is a processed pixel. > >No flames please. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Jerry Olson <jerryols@badlands.nodak.edu> >To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com> >Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 2:11 PM >Subject: Re: Using a NikonLS2000 or Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with a Epson >3000 printer ? > > >> >> ---------- >> >From: "Gary Sellani" <gsellani@accesscom.com> >> >To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com> >> >Subject: Re: Using a NikonLS2000 or Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with a >> Epson 3000 printer ? >> >Date: Thu, Aug 12, 1999, 11:35 AM >> > >> the Polaroid 4000 will give you sharper images, and you can make larger >> prints than with the nikon. Digital Ice doesn't work on black and white >> or kodachrome films. >> >> Jerry >> - >> Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the >excess. >> http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. >> > >- >Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess. >http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. Frank Pryor http://www.pryorphoto.com - Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |