[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Using a NikonLS2000 or Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with a Epson3000 printer ?



And for the technically ponderous among us, the practical difference would be?


>Ladies and Gents, there may be more to this. Here is my understanding of how
>the Nikon scanners work. They have a monochrome CCD and LED illumination to
>generate RGB sequentially. It sounds to me from reading the Polaroid
>SprintScan 4000 technical specification that the unit has a Color CCD with a
>RGB  "shadow" mask. This is similar to comparing a 3CCD camcorder to a 1CCD
>camcorder.
>
>My point is a pixel is a pixel with a Nikon, while a pixel with a shadow
>mask CCD is a processed pixel.
>
>No flames please.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jerry Olson <jerryols@badlands.nodak.edu>
>To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com>
>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 2:11 PM
>Subject: Re: Using a NikonLS2000 or Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with a Epson
>3000 printer ?
>
>
>>
>> ----------
>> >From: "Gary Sellani" <gsellani@accesscom.com>
>> >To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com>
>> >Subject: Re: Using a NikonLS2000 or Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with a
>> Epson 3000 printer ?
>> >Date: Thu, Aug 12, 1999, 11:35 AM
>> >
>> the Polaroid 4000 will give you sharper images, and you can make larger
>> prints than with the nikon. Digital Ice doesn't work on black and white
>> or kodachrome films.
>>
>> Jerry
>> -
>> Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the
>excess.
>> http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
>>
>
>-
>Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess.
>http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.


Frank Pryor
http://www.pryorphoto.com


-
Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.



[Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Scanner]     [Gimp]     [Gimp] Users

Powered by Linux