|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Gary Sellani wrote: > Is a 35mm worthy of 4000 dpi? I think even if the film improves greatly, > the whole 35mm system isn't that good. I would go for the Coolscan and get > the dirt and dust removal. On the other hand, pulling the higher resolution in the scan means that you don't have to interpolate things in Photoshop <G>. Besides, while that dirt and scratch removal in the Nikon scanner works well enough, it also reduces the contrast and apparent sharpness of your scan, so it's not something you'd want to leave in the ON position all the time anyway. Flip a coin, make a choice.We've got a film scanner here that does 5080 dpi on 35mm and the Imacon eeks up there toward 6000, I think. Wonder why? david - Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users