Frank Pryor wrote: > Gary, > > I've been using it for about a year now. At 400 ISO the grain is better > than lab-processed Tri-X. I like the tones better than Tmax 400. This is > entirely subjective. It is a C-41 film, the negative has a brownish tint to > it. Prints up fine with my cold-light enlarger and variable contrast paper. The main difference between the Kodak Tmax Chromogenic film and the XP2 Super from Ilford is that brownish neg tint. XP2 seems to do just as well without it, and is perhaps sharper (if slightly grainier). My only problem is that I haven't been able to find either in 220. Is it available? david - Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.