| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Tim Olive wrote:
> > NEGATIVES VS. CHROMES
>
> Another bummer is that b/w prints are becoming less and less desirable in
> the industry. Many clients ask us to shoot color transparencies and they
> just convert it to b/w, which I hate. The creative process in printing is
> completely lost. Might as well send it to the drug store. The best of both
> worlds would be the ability to hand them a *b/w transparency*, along with
> the file, but I'm not there yet.
In case anyone's interested...
We've got a guy here in LA who processes black and white neg film to a
positive (transparency), but it has a pretty large component of brown,
depending on which of two developer formulations he uses and on the black and
white film used. It's in its infancy, but looks like a pretty nice process,
especially for portraits (commercial-type) and fashion.
There's also SCALA film, designed specifically to be developed to
transparency, but last I checked there were only a few labs in the US capable
of developing it.
Finally, there was/is a kit for processing TMAX films to transparency --
this from Kodak.
david
-
Please do not include an entire message in your response. Delete the excess.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |