| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 09:34 PM 7/18/99 -0700, James Irelan wrote: >I had one realization: I was looking >at a Jerry Uelsmann image, and I suddenly realized: for all the ease >and power of Photoshop in one of its strongest and most widely used suits, >that of compositing, this Uelsmann image is more powerful and affecting >than virtually any digital image I can think of. And, in fact, I >actively dislike many digital composites because they look busy and >phony. Uelsmann's images look majestic and magical. Now, does that mean >I'm going to buy 11 more enlargers? What am I, nuts? It does mean that >tools are tools. The most cumbersome of methods can be made to >work, and the most facile of methods does not guarantee art or vision or >even craft. That was a nice piece, James. So much simple, common sense. What a rarity! Nice to hear from someone who mentions and appreciates the old masters of the craft. Or who appreciates that, just because something *can* be done (with new-found technology) doesn't mean it *should* be done. rafe b. - ** Endura-LE Archival inks and cartridges for Epson 3000 printers.** ** New! Compatible cartridges for Epson Stylus Color 900 printers ** ** Cartridges, bulk ink & refill kits-visit http://www.WeInk.com/ **
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |