[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Adobe RGB versus Bruce RGB (was need ADOBE RGB)



Bob snow wrote :

> Hmmmm.  I'll have to check this out.  I do a lot of landscapes and really
> hadn't compared the two spaces for the cyan/green accuracy.
> 

Well, I've a lot of legacy files from PS4 and my monitor wasn't always well 
calibrated; so this could be the source of my problems with Adobe RGB.

I've had two series of pictures showing these problems : one was a series of 
portraits shot against a light blue/turquoise background. The other were 
landscape pictures of a lake. Color Match is what gave the lower shift toward 
green; then Bruce RGB, then Adobe RGB... 

What I experienced could  be caused by the fact that Adobe RGB gamut  is 
wider on the green side.. so converting a legacy file could be a pain; I've not 
yet tested which colour space would work better when scanning such 
turquoise areas directly to PS5; may be that the wider gamut of Adobe RGB 
would then work better..

 

Christiane Roh
rohcris@vtx.ch
http://www.multimania.com/lunebleue
*************************************************
C'est toujours a l'imparfait de l'objectif
Que tu conjugues le verbe photographier (Jacques Prevert)
-
Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.



[Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Scanner]     [Gimp]     [Gimp] Users

Powered by Linux