Re: need ADOBE RGB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>sRGB was picked at random, and please note:  "for some reason".  I guess if
>someone switches between web stuff and print output this could be a valid
>possibility.  There are folks out there also churning out stuff to the web
>(not
>me, for sure).  Anyway, I agree with you totally.  I started with
>BruceRGB, and
>later switched to Adobe98.  I honestly couldn't see a difference on
>several test pictures.
----------------------
I'd been given to understand that the 'reasoning' for chosing sRGB was
because it was the 'lowest, broadest common denominator' for both platforms
with the poorest monitors in mind---so that it would be the most inclusive,
particularly for web/monitor images.

That is why the professional people were so displeased with it when they
first started loading finely-honed images for press or fine art and seeing
them appaulingly altered in the original automatic conversion--without any
clear warnings of the implications of the changes Adobe made!

Donna

  Donna Aldridge
        Aldridge Studios

Fine Arts~Traditional and Digital Media
       aldridge@maccore.net
-
Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.



[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux