| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Tim; There is considerable merit PHOTOGRAPHICALLY to this argument, but I thought your goal was the reproduction of art work, is that so? In any case, a 4 x 5 camera, and scanning 4 x 5 trannies or negatives in a good flatbed scanner is certainly a valid approach, and should yield quality prints. Jack At 04:19 PM 6/26/99 +0000, you wrote: >Jack Winberg wrote: > >>Why jump to a 4 x 5 though? > >Well, many photo folks I talk to say that if you are going to upgrade >from 35 mm to a medium format camera, it is not much more or even >comparable in price to just go to 4 x 5...unless size of the camera is an >issue. Plus, 4x5 gives you a bigger bang for your buck for >scanning/printing. > >I'm sure many will disagree with this, but I've heard it from numerous >photographers. >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. >http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
|