RE: EX vs. 1200

[Joseph Kuzma <joe@varsitybooks.com>]

I don't know if this is 100% correct, but it looks good, and answers alot of
your questions.

http://www.tssphoto.com/sp/dg/news/dot_comp.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Shamblin [mailto:shamblina@ipix.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:34 PM
To: epson-inkjet@leben.com
Subject: EX vs. 1200


Hi all,

	Was recently about to buy a stylus photo EX, but compUSA didn't have
the stock as the REP promised. So off I go to mail order outlets wherein
lies my dilemma. I started hearing about the 1200 being phased in, with the
EX being phased out. I am very impressed by the EX quality & the new reduced
price, but even EPSON gives me mixed signals on compared specs & just what
the advantages to a 1200 vs. an EX would be. I realize of course the newwer
machine will be faster, but that doesn't really concern me. I am really just
interested in output quality, & low price is quite nice. I am particularilly
concerned with the picoliter drop size. I have heard anything from 6-11 for
the EX & 3-6 for the 1200. Does anyone have a definative answer, as I am
more confused than ever. Is the difference between picoliter drop sizes
discernable with anything besides a microscope? I guess if CompUSA hadn't
lied to me in the first place I would now be a happy clueless clam, printing
my photos on my ne!
w EX! Anything anyone can share will help me immeasurably.

Thanks,

Alan

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages.
http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.