|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
I don't know if this is 100% correct, but it looks good, and answers alot of your questions. http://www.tssphoto.com/sp/dg/news/dot_comp.html -----Original Message----- From: Alan Shamblin [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:34 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: EX vs. 1200 Hi all, Was recently about to buy a stylus photo EX, but compUSA didn't have the stock as the REP promised. So off I go to mail order outlets wherein lies my dilemma. I started hearing about the 1200 being phased in, with the EX being phased out. I am very impressed by the EX quality & the new reduced price, but even EPSON gives me mixed signals on compared specs & just what the advantages to a 1200 vs. an EX would be. I realize of course the newwer machine will be faster, but that doesn't really concern me. I am really just interested in output quality, & low price is quite nice. I am particularilly concerned with the picoliter drop size. I have heard anything from 6-11 for the EX & 3-6 for the 1200. Does anyone have a definative answer, as I am more confused than ever. Is the difference between picoliter drop sizes discernable with anything besides a microscope? I guess if CompUSA hadn't lied to me in the first place I would now be a happy clueless clam, printing my photos on my ne! w EX! Anything anyone can share will help me immeasurably. Thanks, Alan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users