Dan Culbertson wrote: > > Well, as a choirboy in the same temple (is that a mixed metaphor?) I have > some trouble making these fine distinctions myself. But here and there I > get the feeling that they don't rest on absolutely firm footing. Usually > they are straight forward enough to admit when they are talking from "feel" > rather than science. > Dan Culbertson > > C. David Tobie wrote: > >In a message dated 5/29/99 11:09:07 AM, danculb@concentric.net writes: > > > >>I just don't consider him to be in league with Blatner > >>and Fraser (though they have a few "religious" preferences about printing > >>as well!). > > > >I agree on all counts, but feel compelled to ask what you consider B&F's > >religious preferences... from my seat in the same pew they are a bit hard to > >distinguish. <G> > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Please do your part: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. > http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions on using this list. Am I missing something! This sure doesn't sound like Epson printers to me. Unless this has something to do with Epson please take it somewhere else. Jim Davis www.visual-artists.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Please do your part: Stay on topic. Trim quoted messages. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions on using this list.