Re: 2200 vs. 1280

[Ursula Freer <art@ursulafreer.com>]

Thanks for clearing this up, I had no idea! I had not paid attention to
posts about printers that are not on my "list".

Ursula

> Ursula,
> I think you misunderstood the post.   I think that person was saying that the
> 2200 can do *both* color and B&W, without switching inks due to the 7th (grey)
> color, where as the 1280 cannot.
> 
> Harvey Ferdschneider
> partner, SKID Photography, NYC
> 
>> You may be saving the expense of buying two printers, but you'd be spending
>> money on the wasted ink by changing from one set to another.
>> 
>> Ursula
>>> But if the 2200 prints b&w as good as the reviews claim, it could save
>>> me the expense of buying two separate printers--a 1280 for color, and a
>>> 3000 (or used 1160) with piezography drivers/inks for b&w.
>>> 
>>> Dan

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.