Re: 7600, 2200 comparison
Jack,
I believe the print quality between the 2200 and 7600 will be identical. The
7600 will offer much larger prints sizes and ink economy.
--- Jack Arnold <jack.arnold@dashe.com> wrote:
> Looking at the specs for these two printers, it appears to me that the only
> reason for going with the 7600 (or 9600) as far as image quality is
> concerned would be the larger format. Otherwise, I would think that image
> quality would be the same, and that print head technology would be pretty
> much the same among these models. Can anyone comment?
>
> thanks
>
> Jack
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
=====
Visit my digital photography web site along with a lot of other interesting stuff at http://www.mikegreer.com. Also, Greer and Associates (http://www.greeraa.com) offers studio photography, digital imaging services, web site design/construction, and training.
Mike Greer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Home]
[Photo]
[Photo Printers]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite Book Store]
[Scanner]
[Free Online Dating]
[Gimp]
[Deep Creek Hot Springs]
[Photo Sharing]
[Linux Power Management]
[Gimp Users]
[Epson FAQ]