RE: new printer
Mike,
> My only point in all of this is that now more than ever, printers,
inks,
> and paper are systems. It just doesn't make sense to me to buy a 2200
> and use 3rd party ink when access to the UC inks is one of if not the
> main reason to even consider a 2200.
Agreed. I should have read your original post more carefully. I like
the idea of buying the larger cartridges for the 76/9600 and siphoning
the ink from them to use for the 2200.
For me, the choice is not so much between epson and 3rd party inks: it's
between buying separate printers dedicated to b&w and color, or one
printer that can do both with virtually the same high-quality results.
The extra longevity of the pigment inks is just icing for me; if any of
the dye-based inkjets could produce b&w without the metamerism and print
to 13x18, I'd gladly go that route.
Dan
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo]
[Photo Printers]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite Book Store]
[Scanner Archive]
[Free Online Dating]
[Gimp]
[Deep Creek Hot Springs]
[Photo Sharing]
[Linux Power Management]
[Gimp Users]