|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Search Epson Archive
From: "Bob Frost" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Sharpening [was Re: Resolution and print quality] You make some very interesting and valid points, in addition I learned a thing or two. It was a well written and informative post. ".... to try to produce an unreal picture that satisfies their artistic interpretation of the scene." But isn't that what the great artists all have done throughout history? What's wrong with that? But what we are approaching is the old "photograph or art" conversation and that is dependent on the one making and printing the image and their intent. Photography is an art, but a photograph is not necessarily an art-type image, although it can be, or the basis thereof. How one treats one or the other depends of the desired result. I think the degree to which you "enhance" the image is the difference between the two. I make a distinction between "enhance" and "manipulate". An image can be manipulated greatly and still retain the basic integrity of the image, it is technically better but not significantly different. There's room for both. Is the person a photographer or a "fine artist"? (don't anyone get on my case for me almost referring to enhanced photographic images as being true fine art, you know what I mean-I hope!) Debating the technical and aesthetic merits of sharpening, not sharpening or how to execute the sharpening (or any image enhancement) is all but an exercise in futility and individual-dependent. Why, how, how much is up to the photographer/artist. As in most things there are a number of reasons for what you do and why. Warmest Regards, Carl Grohs, Jr. Design Directions Eden, NC Epson FAQ Site: http://home.att.net/~arwomack01/ (the FAQ list compliments of Alan Womack) Epson List Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epson-inkjet/ - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.