For me, Monaco has been better, partially because Profiler Plus gives me a terribly skewed default profile from my scanner ... purple skies and strange greeny-yellows only correctable using DocPro. Also, I prefer EZcolor's visual editing interface. I find that it leads to far less trial and error experimentation to get a decent profile. I have occasionally gotten a default profile from EZcolor that required no editing; this has never been the case with ProfilerPro (but this may be because it chokes on my scanner ... hard to say). But, as the archives of this list will attest, there are many happy Profiler Plus users. Cathy Brown http://catbrownphoto.com Epson list archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/epson-inkjet/ Epson list FAQ http://welcome.to/epson-inkjet -----Original Message----- From: owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com [mailto:owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com] On Behalf Of Joel Nisson Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:28 PM To: Epson-inkjet Subject: ProfilerPLUS vs Monaco EZ Color Has anyone done or seen a good comparison of ProfilerPLUS versus Monaco EZ Color ICC creation software? I"m building profiles for Lyson Fotonic inks using several different papers. So far, I find that ProfilerPLUS seems better, but I would welcome hearing about others' experiences. Joel Nisson jdn@bird9.com - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.