Re: eCryptfs: Truncate path improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 2012-01-23 08:49:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As Linus pointed out[1], eCryptfs needs more checks around its truncate path.
> > The first patch in this series makes it possible for an eCryptfs truncate
> > operation to be gracefully interrupted by a fatal signal. The second adds
> > checks for eCryptfs inode changes in setattr. The third is simply removal of
> > an old, unused function.
> Tyler, should I take these patches directly? Or are these just for
> review and I should wait for a pull request?

Just for review, as I'll send a pull request.

I'll try to be more clear about that in the future.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

Powered by Linux