- To: ecos-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: How to "unimlement" an interface?
- From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:33:20 +0000 (UTC)
- Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- User-agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux)
I'm using a legacy flash driver that doesn't need somebody else to
fiddle the caches. How do I "unimplement"
CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE_NEEDS_CACHE_HANDLED which is "implemented" by
CYGHWR_IO_FLASH_DEVICE_LEGACY?
I don't understand why the interface/implement scheme is being used
this way. If a flash driver requires cache handling shouldn't it
"require" something rather than "implement" something?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Does someone from
at PEORIA have a SHORTER
gmail.com ATTENTION span than me?
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
[Linux Embedded]
[U-Boot V2]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux MIPS]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux for the Blind]
[Linux Resources]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[ISDN Cause Codes]
[ECOS Home]
[Site Home]