Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday 26 March 2009 03:34:53 Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
>
>> Mauro,
>>
>> This patch allows users with multiple remotes to specify an RC5 address
>> for a remote from which key codes will be accepted. If no address is
>> specified, the default value of 0 accepts key codes from any remote. This
>> replaces the current hard-coded address checks, which are too
>> restrictive.
>>
>
> I think this should be reviewed by Steve Toth first (CC-ed him).
>
> One thing that this patch breaks is if you have multiple Hauppauge remotes,
> some sending 0x1e, some 0x1f. With this patch I can't use both, only one.
>
>
Hans, thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Mauro, This patch is a regression, although a small one. it probably
needs a little more work.
I too tend to have multiple remotes, I don't think it's that unusual for
long standing Hauppauge customers to have many boards with many types of
remotes.
> It might be better to have an option to explicitly allow old Hauppauge
> remotes that send 0x00.
>
>
I could live with this. It relegates older remotes but those remotes are
no longer made. This feels like a good compromise.
- Steve
_______________________________________________
v4l-dvb-maintainer mailing list
v4l-dvb-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/v4l-dvb-maintainer
[Linux Media]
[Older V4L]
[Linux DVB]
[Video Disk Recorder]
[Asterisk]
[Photo]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Xorg]
[Util Linux NG]
[Xfree86]
[Free Photo Albums]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Women]
[ALSA Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[SSH]
[Linux USB]
 |
 |
-->