Re: Hauppauge/IR breakage with 2.6.28/2.6.29

[Darron Broad <darron@xxxxxxxx>]

In message <20090326000932.6aa1a456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Udo A. Steinberg" wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>The following patch
>http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git-commits-head/2008/10/13/3643574
>that was added between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 has resulted in my Hauppauge
>WinTV IR remote not working anymore. I've tracked down the breakage to:
>
>if (dev!=3D0x1e && dev!=3D0x1f)=20
>  return 0;
>
>in drivers/media/video/ir-kbd-i2c.c
>
>My remote sends with dev=3D0x0 and is the following model:
>http://www.phphuoc.com/reviews/tvtuner_hauppauge_wintv_theater/index_files/=
>image001.jpg
>
>Removing the check results in the remote working again. Is there a way to
>convince the remote to send a different dev? Otherwise I guess the check
>should be relaxed.

You are correct. I happen to have one of those ancient remote
controls myself and it does use device address 0.

Please refer to http://www.sbprojects.com/knowledge/ir/rc5.htm
for an overview of device addresses.

It's something I forget to deal with in that patch. A solution
would be to allow a device address to be a module param to
override the more modern addresses of 0x1e and 0x1f.

I can't remember addresses off the top of my head but I believe
the modern silver remotes use 0x1f and the older black ones
use 0x1e. I think the black one I have came with a now dead
DEC2000.

The problem with reverting the patch is that it makes modern
systems unusable as HTPCs when the television uses RC5. This
is a more important IMHO than supporting what in reality is
an obsolete remote control.

cya!

--

 // /
{:)==={ Darron Broad <darron@xxxxxxxx>
 \\ \ 


_______________________________________________
v4l-dvb-maintainer mailing list
v4l-dvb-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/v4l-dvb-maintainer