From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:11:31 +0200 > IMO, it's the reverse selection from sound to V4L that makes things > complicated. I believe it's better to fix it as a normal dependency. > > How about the patch below? The question that remains is what does this mean for users? How does a user, who wants to enable this 'sound' driver, learn that they must enable the v4l subsystem in order to do so? This is typically why select constructs are used, to not bother the user with such messy details. But like we see in this case, it can cause serious implementation problems if not used properly. :( _______________________________________________ v4l-dvb-maintainer mailing list v4l-dvb-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/v4l-dvb-maintainer