Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm: add optional per device rwsem for all ioctls |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:51:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:18:28AM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > Nouveau, in normal circumstances, does not need device lock for every ioctl,
> > but incoming "gpu reset" code needs exclusive access to the device.
> > This commit adds drm_driver flag which turns on read lock ioctl encapsulation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Why can't we just move this down to nouveau driver code?
Ok, I think it's easily possible by wrapping drm_ioctl.
> So why can't nouveau do the same? Also, if this is indeed necessary and we
> add this as some mandatory core infrastructure, it's not good enough: In
> i915 we go to great lengths to ensure that all processes waiting for gpu
> reset are still interruptible, in case the gpu reset dies unexpectedly
> (which happens), so this would need to be improved.
I came up with a scheme where down_read can be made interruptible.
I'll post both changes in a few days.
(Unfortunately adding proper down_read_interruptible / down_write_interruptible
require a bit of unfunny work - 8 architectures have their own code for rwsems)
Marcin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Home]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Video Projectors]
[PDAs]
[Free Online Dating]
[Hacking TiVo]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[16.7MP]