Hi Hannes,
On 04/03/12 01:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> This patch allows to pass in a NULL hardware handler to
> scsi_dh_attach(), causing the reference count of the existing
> hardware handler to be increased.
> An error will be returned if no hardware handler is attached.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> index 48e46f5..77fa67e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> @@ -475,10 +475,14 @@ int scsi_dh_attach(struct request_queue *q, const char *name)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> struct scsi_device *sdev;
> - struct scsi_device_handler *scsi_dh;
> + struct scsi_device_handler *scsi_dh = NULL;
> int err = 0;
>
> - scsi_dh = get_device_handler(name);
> + if (name) {
> + scsi_dh = get_device_handler(name);
> + } else if (sdev->scsi_dh_data) {
> + scsi_dh = sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh;
> + }
> if (!scsi_dh)
> return -EINVAL;
It won't work. sdev is not initialized...
Thanks,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
[DM Crypt]
[Fedora Desktop]
[ATA RAID]
[Fedora Marketing]
[Fedora Packaging]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Yosemite Discussion]
[Yosemite Photos]
[KDE Users]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora Docs]