Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance -- Fedora Linux Users


Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
From: Joe Thornber <thornber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:58:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <1327449515.67553.YahooMailNeo@web36401.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mail-followup-to: Jagan Reddy <gjmsreddy@xxxxxxxxx>, device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1326416116.56981.YahooMailNeo@web36404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20120116124158.GA4426@ubuntu> <1326915054.99335.YahooMailNeo@web36407.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20120120170335.GA10518@ubuntu> <20120120173333.GA12920@ubuntu> <20120120180721.GB12920@ubuntu> <1327093568.21183.YahooMailNeo@web36404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20120122202429.GA27507@ubuntu> <1327449515.67553.YahooMailNeo@web36401.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:58:35PM -0800, Jagan Reddy wrote:
> Joe,
>  I was running more tests to get more data.

Could I trouble you to grab my test suite [1], add your machine to the
config.rb file and then:

      ./run_tests -t /RamDisk/

and see if those results are different too please?

- Joe

[1] https://github.com/jthornber/thinp-test-suite

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Jagan Reddy

References:
- dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Jagan Reddy
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Jagan Reddy
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Jagan Reddy
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
  - From: Jagan Reddy

Prev by Date: [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix memory corruption caused by repeated calls to bitmap_load
Next by Date: Re: dd to a striped device with 9 disks gets much lower throughput when oflag=direct used
Previous by thread: Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
Next by thread: Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]