Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] a few storage topics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:15:04AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> This patch is another example, although for a slight different reason.
> I really have no idea yet what the right answer is in a generic sense,
> but you don't need a 512K request to see higher latencies from merging.

That assumes the 512k requests is created by merging.  We have enough
workloads that create large I/O from the get go, and not splitting them
and eventually merging them again would be a big win.  E.g. I'm
currently looking at a distributed block device which uses internal 4MB
chunks, and increasing the maximum request size to that dramatically
increases the read performance.

dm-devel mailing list

[DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

Add to Google Powered by Linux