|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hi guys, thanks for your effort. Meanwhile I had to start over and format the whole device. I have a backup. Allthough it is not really up to date, I can work with it. Thanks again artificial On 04/08/2012 10:35 PM, Arno Wagner wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 06:23:22PM +0200, artificial11000 wrote:Hi, as I noticed that I can't access the device, I recreated the raid manually. mdadm --create --level=5 -n 3 /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd Could this damage the key-slot? Are the metadata of the RAID relevant to this? I read that old versions of mdadm created RAIDs with metadata=0.90 and the newer versions with metadata=1.20.This may be an additional problem or the only problem. Metadata 0.90 is at the end of the device. Metadata 1.20 is 4k from the start of the device. The other versions are in still other places. (I have no idea what messed up process created these thorougly insane changes.) So, yes, 4k offset is right in the first key-stripe. If so, then your data is pemanently gone unless you have a header-backup. In this case it is also possible that the array actually assembled right and the problem is _only_ the new raid metadata block. Arno
_______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
[DM Devel] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]
![]() |
![]() |