|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Hello,
i have the following setup:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz
Storage Controller: RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132
Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
External Storage: Lian Li Ex-503 connected via esata to the SiI 3132
Controller.
HDDs: 5x WD 10 EARX 2TB
On the Lian Li Ex-503 i have setup port multiplier mode, because i want
to make a md raid instead using the Lian Li Ex-503 raid.
So i have setup a raid 5 over the 5 HDDs with the following command:
mdadm -C -v /dev/md0 -n 5 -l raid5 -b internal -N data /dev/sdd1
/dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1 /dev/sdh1
After initial sync finished, i made some performance tests with dd.
* dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=64k
271401+0 Datensätze ein
271400+0 Datensätze aus
17786470400 Bytes (18 GB) kopiert, 123,919 s, 144 MB/s
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0,08 0,00 4,83 19,65 0,00 75,44
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sde 6428,33 0,00 57,67 0,00 26282,67 0,00
911,54 1,41 24,45 24,45 0,00 13,24 76,33
sdf 6428,33 0,00 57,67 0,00 26197,33 0,00
908,58 1,94 33,58 33,58 0,00 15,90 91,67
sdg 6428,33 0,00 57,33 0,00 26112,00 0,00
910,88 2,31 40,17 40,17 0,00 17,03 97,67
sdh 6428,33 0,00 57,33 0,00 26026,67 0,00
907,91 1,73 29,88 29,88 0,00 15,41 88,33
sdd 6428,33 0,00 57,00 0,00 25941,33 0,00
910,22 2,96 51,46 51,46 0,00 17,54 100,00
md0 0,00 0,00 32426,67 0,00 129706,67 0,00
8,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Which brings ~129MB/s read performance.
* dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=64k
70665+0 Datensätze ein
70665+0 Datensätze aus
4631101440 Bytes (4,6 GB) kopiert, 36,7757 s, 126 MB/s
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0,00 0,00 3,00 23,92 0,00 73,08
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sde 0,00 5756,00 0,67 47,00 2,67 23042,67
966,94 1,59 33,15 20,00 33,33 20,56 98,00
sdf 0,00 5756,00 0,67 47,00 2,67 23042,67
966,94 1,67 34,83 20,00 35,04 20,56 98,00
sdg 0,00 5756,00 0,00 47,00 0,00 23042,67
980,54 1,67 35,39 0,00 35,39 20,78 97,67
sdh 0,00 5756,00 0,67 47,00 2,67 23042,67
966,94 1,70 35,59 30,00 35,67 20,70 98,67
sdd 0,00 5756,00 0,67 47,00 2,67 23042,67
966,94 0,91 18,95 20,00 18,94 18,04 86,00
md0 0,00 0,00 0,00 23040,00 0,00 92160,00
8,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Which brings ~92MB/s write performance.
Ok these tests were on the unencrypted raid.
Then i created a cryptsetup luks container with:
cryptsetup --cipher aes-xts-plain64 --key-file /dev/random create
crypt_data2 /dev/md0
Now if i repeat the above performance tests read performance is ok but,
write performance is imho really bad.
* dd if=/dev/mapper/crypt_data2 of=/dev/null bs=64k
152114+0 Datensätze ein
152113+0 Datensätze aus
9968877568 Bytes (10 GB) kopiert, 77,203 s, 129 MB/s
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0,00 0,00 27,03 16,74 0,00 56,23
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sde 6428,00 0,00 58,00 0,00 26197,33 0,00
903,36 1,45 25,11 25,11 0,00 13,39 77,67
sdf 6428,33 0,00 57,00 0,00 25941,33 0,00
910,22 1,97 34,50 34,50 0,00 16,32 93,00
sdg 6428,33 0,00 57,33 0,00 26026,67 0,00
907,91 2,40 41,86 41,86 0,00 17,15 98,33
sdh 6428,33 0,00 57,33 0,00 26112,00 0,00
910,88 1,70 29,59 29,59 0,00 14,88 85,33
sdd 6428,33 0,00 57,00 0,00 25941,33 0,00
910,22 2,41 42,16 42,16 0,00 17,13 97,67
md0 0,00 0,00 32426,67 0,00 129706,67 0,00
8,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
dm-16 0,00 0,00 32426,67 0,00 129706,67 0,00
8,00 1250,96 38,54 38,54 0,00 0,03 100,00
Which brings ~129MB/s read performance on the encrypted raid 5.
But also with 100% utilization of the dm-16 block device.
* dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/crypt_data2 bs=64k
40370+0 Datensätze ein
40370+0 Datensätze aus
2645688320 Bytes (2,6 GB) kopiert, 426,961 s, 6,2 MB/s
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0,08 0,00 2,01 24,75 0,00 73,16
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sde 224,67 222,33 9,00 6,00 934,67 913,33
246,40 0,83 55,11 44,07 71,67 23,33 35,00
sdf 509,33 516,00 21,00 13,67 2101,33 1926,67
232,38 1,49 37,88 29,52 50,73 12,79 44,33
sdg 464,67 474,67 20,67 17,33 1961,33 2186,67
218,32 1,10 35,53 23,55 49,81 9,65 36,67
sdh 180,67 182,33 7,33 5,67 752,00 752,00
231,38 0,64 49,49 40,45 61,18 18,72 24,33
sdd 164,00 166,33 6,67 4,33 682,67 682,67
248,24 0,75 68,48 64,00 75,38 22,42 24,67
md0 0,00 0,00 0,00 804,00 0,00 3216,00
8,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
dm-16 0,00 0,00 0,00 7551,33 0,00 30205,33
8,00 281284,91 7252,80 0,00 7252,80 0,13 100,00
Which brings ~5MB/s write performance on the encrypted raid 5.
What i find strange is the huge avgqu-sz.
I have no clue what the reason for this poor write performance could be.
Thanks for every hint to resolve this issue.
Tomorrow morning i will make some performance tests with different ciphers.
Kind regards,
morlix
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
[DM Devel] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]
|
|