|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > I thing your risk model is wrong. Basically it covers attacks > were the attacker has access to only the storage and at the same > time can actually do something serious with data manipulation. > That is a rather unlikely scenario for disk encryption. Note that > for communication encryption, this is a real and valid scenario. Given the prevalence of of iSCSI, FC and similar, I wouldn't say it's all that unlikely. I for one would quite like assurances that network block device providers couldn't impact my security. But, I imagine I'll have to wait a while longer... -- Roscoe _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
[DM Devel] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]
|
|