On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0000, gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > --- a/net/dccp/probe.c
> > +++ b/net/dccp/probe.c
> > @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ static __init int dccpprobe_init(void)
> > if (!proc_net_fops_create(&init_net, procname, S_IRUSR,
> > &dccpprobe_fops))
> > goto err0;
> >
> > - ret = try_then_request_module((register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe) == 0),
> > + try_then_request_module(
> > + ((ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe)) == 0),
> > "dccp");
> > if (ret)
> > goto err1;
>
> Apologies for the late response -- delays are sometimes possible due to
> day job. The only problem that I had with this patch was that it was
> apparently not tested, causing the described problems.
>
>
> > I've not tested it, but this should do it,
> > without re-breaking the silent dependency.
>
> I will test it and get back to you until tomorrow morning (GMT),
> if it works I'll also push it out in the test tree.
>
> Thanks a lot for getting back and devising a different route.
>
Thanks, and apologies for being brusque. I just didn't want to fix what is
clearly a problem in what you describe by rebreaking a previously seen problem.
I expect this should work just fine. Let me know if it doesn't and I'll
resurrect my test bed here and take a look
Neil
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[IETF DCCP]
[Linux Networking]
[Git]
[Security]
[Linux Assembly]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Resources]