Re: dccp test tree [RFC/RFT] [Patch 1/3] dccp: minor Kconfig cosmetics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Wei Yongjun <yjwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > Gerrit Renker wrote:
| 
| >> +         value. Values in units of milliseconds can be set here.
| >> +
| >> +         A value of 0 disables this feature by enforcing the value
| >> specified
| >> +         in RFC 5448. The following values have been suggested as bounds
| >> for
| >>
| >
| > RFC 5448 should be RFC 5348.
| 
| Indeed.
| 
A genuine blunder - I had verified the section references but not the
RFC number. It is really good to see that people do look: that is why
I don't make changes to the test tree without also submitting these.

The only exception to this rule are a few patches that have been
deleted, such as the one to auto-load CCIDs, and 2 patches that became
obsolete in the CCID-4 tree. At the moment I don't know what to do
with that CCID-4 tree, will just keep it up-to-date, it might be good to
reorganise the about 20 patches some time.

Again thanks a lot to you, Wei, and Ian
Gerrit

Just fixed it in the test tree
http://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dccp_exp.git;a=commitdiff;h=11fc1dc11eafab0bd18c22f717a9b2155a383383
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux