Re: QUESTION : Feature length about the non-negotiable feature

[Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>
>> Thus, although the RFC says otherwise, I think that using the smallest
>> option size for a given value is the right thing to do.
>>
>>   
>
> Yes, you can save some space for store more data, but this break the  
> compatibility. If the other system implement follow the RFC, since those  
> feature will be treat as invalid value. Also if it is set as mandatory  
> option, assoc will be reset. endpoint with different implement can not  
> talk to each other. That is the problem.
>
After your email yesterday I checked the RFC and found it indeed uses
fixed lengths. I have therefore updated the code so that the NN options
have the described fixed lengths (Ack Ratio = 2, Sequence Window = 6).

This has been tested, I will post the changelog for the test tree
shortly and upload the amended tree. I would be grateful if you could
give this a spin with your test cases.

Thanks again.
Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html