Chet Ramey wrote:
> The way I read 2.10.2, Posix requires that the "fi" resolve to the
> reserved word `fi' in this case, since it's in a position where a
> command name is expected (Rule 1, [Command Name]). I would think that
> would make it a syntax error in any application, conforming or not.
Yes, I think you're right.
For some reason I thought that using reserved words in ways not
permitted by the grammar produced undefined behavior, to support
shells with extensions like the arithmetic "for". But now that I read
more closely, it looks like "function", "[[", "]]", and "select"
produce unspecified behavior but everything else is pretty well
specified. Thanks for clarifying.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[LARTC]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Photo]