Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Thing is, the scheduler doesn't care about completion, all it needs is
> to be able to kick-start the thing atomically. So you really have to
> wait for it or can you do an interrupt driven state machine?

Or the scheduler callback could schedule a wq to do the job ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux