Re: [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] EXYNOS: Initialize locking_frequency with initial frequency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:24:56PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:

 > >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> index 5467879..7cfb516 100644
 > >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 > >>>  
 > >>>  	cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu);
 > >>>  
 > >>> +	locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
 > >>> +
 > >>>  	/* set the transition latency value */
 > >>>  	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000;
 > 
 > Any concerns with this patch?

it's in my queue for applying to -next. I'll clear everything out today.

	Dave

 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux