Re: [PATCH V3 4/7] cpufreq: add generic cpufreq driver

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:20:46AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:

> > > > > You also need to define how the core supplies get looked up.
> > > 
> > > > It's pure software. platform uses this driver have to define "cpu" consumer.
> > > 
> > > You still need to define this in the binding.
> > You mean regulator DT binding? already in ? I'll check it.
> Mark, cpu node is not a struct device, sys_device instead. I can not find
> regulator via device/dt node. Can I still use the string to get regulator
> after converting to DT?

I believe Kay and Greg have the plan to unify "class" and "bus" in sysfs, which
implies turning sys_device into a derived class of device instead of kobject.
If that understanding is correct, we might as well do that now so we can
attach a device_node to a sys_device.

Kay, does this make sense?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html