- Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: add arm soc generic cpufreq driver
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:42:29 -0800
- Cc: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, eric.miao@xxxxxxxxxx, cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davej@xxxxxxxxxx, linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20111219010357.GW28768@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
- References: <1324031462-24961-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <1324031462-24961-2-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <20111216105229.GB3230@totoro> <4EEBA306.3060309@codeaurora.org> <20111219010357.GW28768@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
On 12/18/11 17:03, Richard Zhao wrote:
>
> Do you have to patch to implement per-cpu udelay? In current code, udelay uses
> global loops_per_jiffy.
>
>
We've been carrying forward the timer based udelay patches. They're in
the patch tracker as 6873/1, 6874/1, and 6875/1.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]