Re: why remove lcr from corosync release 2.0.x?

["Fabio M. Di Nitto" <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Please keep your replies on the mailing list.

On 6/6/2012 9:47 AM, george wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 2012/6/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> 
>     On 6/6/2012 9:08 AM, george wrote:
> 
>     >
>     > Also pacemaker v1.6.x and cman v3 will use lcr lib in corosync, so
>     does
>     > it mean pcmk v1.6.x and cman v3 can’t use the newest corosync?
> 
>     corosync 2.0 has votequorum (see man pages) that obsoleted cman in the
>     2.0 serie. You will need pcmk 1.1.7 or higher to work with that.
> 
> 1、Does that mean LCR lib will be permanently deleted from corosync 2.0 ?

It has been removed permanently already.

> 
> 2、corosync 2.0 could only be worked with pcmk 1.1.7 or higher, and
> can't work with cman ?

Yes that is correct. cman has been replaced by votequorum. cman will
only work with corosync 1.4.x (or higher) for several years to come.

Fabio

> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Qiu Zhigang 
> 
>     Fabio
>     _______________________________________________
>     discuss mailing list
>     discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss