On 8/2/2012 6:36 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 07:26 PM, Zama Ques wrote:
>
>> Is it not going to be a useful feature if we allow same nodes to be
>> used in different clusters ?
>
> Even if we leave aside the fact that a lot of code would need to be
> rewritten and retested, it's a feature that would benefit very users, at
I meant to write "very FEW users"...
> the cost of making the management of the cluster extremely more
> complicated for the user and you gain nothing in HA terms.
>
> At the end of the day it is cheaper to buy an extra node and have two
> separate clusters.
>
> Fabio
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
[Corosync Cluster Engine]
[Linux RAID]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Legacy List]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[KDE Users]