Design question about VG / LV in a clustered environement
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Hi !Since the last couple of months, we had a few problems with the maner we designed our clustered filesystem and we are planing to do a re-design of the filesystems and how they are used.
Our cluster is composed of 8 nodes, connected via fibre channel, to a raid enclosure where we have 6 pair of 1-tb drives in mirror, so 6 1tb physical volumes.
First of all, our services that are run from the cluster are running inside of directories. For exemple, a webserver for a given application is run from /CyberCat/WebServer/(...) That directory contains all executable (apache, php for exemple) and the related data, except for the databases. /CyberCat being a single GFS partition containing several other services.
This filesystem and another one like this containing services for some other clients occupy a single VG composed of 2 PV (total 2tb). The remaining (4) other PV are used in one 1tb VG each, and those VG contains only one LV that is used for databases servers.
For availibility reasons, we are planing of spliting the /CyberCat (and the other one like it) FS into several smaller filesystems, one for each service.
The reason being that in the event that we need to make a filesystem check, or any other unplaned reason, on any filesystem it won't affect other services.
So, now comes the question I have : 1. First of all, is this a bad idea ?2. Is there any disadvantages of doing a single volume group composed of many physical volumes, enabling us to move the extents of a logical volume from one physical volume to another one, so that load is more balanced in the event we need it.
Thanks for the input.
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster