Greetings,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> The latest/greatest upstream fsck.gfs2 has the ability to recreate
> pretty much any and all damaged system structures and system files,
> but there's only so much it can do. That's why I suggested trying the
> experimental RHEL6 version, which isn't too far out of date from
> the upstream version. It's much better at recovering single blocks
> that have been overwritten, rather than a group of blocks. It's
> actually quite sophisticated in recreating things.
>
Well, can't we (the Redhat/Centos fanboys) expect a critical Clustered
filesystem like GFS2 (Which supports over 16TB on a 64-bit bit systems
at least) take a leaf or two from () ZFS on this issue?
Of course, I don't support misuse of "dd" on any critical system by
anybody. I will make sure that they will not been seen within 100KM
radius near that cluster after doing that. Though I am not vindictive,
I will "hunt them, chase them" and whatever. Even an alcoholic/drug
addict does not do that.
Well, above just my IMHO.
--
Regards,
Rajagopal
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
[Corosync Cluster Engine]
[Linux RAID]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Legacy List]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[KDE Users]
