Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Xinxin,

On 05/28/2014 05:05 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
Hi sage ,
I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile the code that get from ceph repository , with  --with-librocksdb option ,  in case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb code , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?

since current rocksdb does not support autoconf&automake , I will add autoconf&automake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .

I'm looking at testing out the rocksdb support as well, both for the OSD and for the monitor based on some issues we've been seeing lately. Any news on the 3.0 fork and autoconf/automake support in rocksdb?

Thanks,
Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jian
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
Hi, sage

I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. Then optimize on rocksdb performance.

I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here.  Last winter I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb.  I'm very interested in what you see with rocksdb as a backend.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sage Weil [mailto:sage@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi Xinxin,

I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that includes the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb patch.  There is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule.  I'm thinking that, since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this point, this is going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.

If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com.  I suspect that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use the static or dynamically linked one.

Has your group done further testing with rocksdb?  Anything interesting to share?

Thanks!
sage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux