Re: leap second
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: leap second
- From: Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:52:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <DD280A5D-1660-40C9-B593-ACB0010518FF@eckel-edv.de>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 7/2/2012 10:24 AM, Peter Eckel wrote: > > ... and leap seconds are not even scarce. An event on an unpredictable schedule averaging 1.7 years since 1972 doesn't count as "scarce"? That's the answer to Les's outrage, too, by the way. Might as well expect the JRE to have code to deal with cosmic ray damage that gets by ECC, too. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: leap second
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: leap second
- References:
- leap second
- From: Bob Hoffman
- Re: leap second
- From: Mogens Kjaer
- Re: leap second
- From: Erez Zarum
- Re: leap second
- From: me
- Re: leap second
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: leap second
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: leap second
- From: Peter Eckel
- leap second
- Prev by Date: Re: leap second
- Next by Date: Re: leap second
- Previous by thread: Re: leap second
- Next by thread: Re: leap second
- Index(es):
[CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Xfree86] [Linux USB] [Project Hail Cloud Computing]
 |
 |