Re: leap second
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: leap second
- From: Vitaliy Shevchuk <222imphotep222@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:51:31 +0300
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4E11CA47-A817-4F93-ADD4-06EBB1B08BE2@eckel-edv.de>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0
On 07/02/2012 10:21 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
> Hi Morgens,
>
>> Some java processes were >100% CPU after the leap second was added.
> same problem here ... OpenNMS hat 100% CPU and didn't do anything anymore.
>
> Rebooting is not necessary, though. For me it worked to just set the time manually once, and everything was back to normal.
>
> It doesn't strike me as a particularly good idea to insert a ':60' second - software that does proper sanity checks on date/time values is supposed to barf on that.
>
> Peter.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello.
try execute:
date -s "`date -u`" && service ntpd restart
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- References:
- leap second
- From: Bob Hoffman
- Re: leap second
- From: Mogens Kjaer
- Re: leap second
- From: Peter Eckel
- leap second
- Prev by Date: Re: leap second
- Next by Date: Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- Previous by thread: Re: leap second
- Next by thread: size of netinst iso
- Index(es):
[CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Xfree86] [Linux USB] [Project Hail Cloud Computing]
 |
 |